Connect with us


Panasonic, The Lumbering Tech Massive That Makes Cameras.



The only way to endure — it seems — is to have a substantial industry share (like Canon) or participate in a much larger company (like Fujifilm). Or, indeed, equally (like Sony). Panasonic comes to the latter camp, a stalwart of the electronic time that continues to drive out new models. So what is their strategy, and where is it going?

A Breakdown of the Business

Panasonic, known as Matsushita until 2008, is not just a small business, with a turnover of ~$65 thousand (in 2021) and hiring some 260,000 people. Their primary emphasis is on house appliances, such as electronic devices, production in large volumes equipment such as home appliances, refrigeration, displays (projectors and TVs), DVDs, PCs, and cameras. Nevertheless, Panasonic also styles and sells to the consultant avionics, automotive, and professional markets.

Their cameras fall within the much larger Devices Team, which makes up 37% of income, while different large divisions include Living Alternatives (22%), Automotive (20%), and Professional (19%). For Panasonic, 2021 found a slight lowering of revenue (11%) and running gain (12%), even though the Devices Team found a smaller decline in revenue (4%) but an increase in running growth (8%).\

Beyond this standard overarching view of the company, it’s nearly impossible to get any meaningful information on Panasonic’s cameras; if you appear through their 2021 financial record, cameras aren’t also stated, while disaggregating their revenue is difficult as the organization does not talk about cameras (let alone revenue volumes!) and the only different primary full is from the BCN Awards Data. Panasonic does not function in the three principal classes (mirrorless, DSLR, integrated), although it steamrollered the video camera prize, taking 43.6% of revenue, followed closely by Sony (26.3%) and DJI (11.2%). Nevertheless, this is not something group for CIPA, so we do not know how many worldwide deliveries they represent.


Panasonic’s corporate headquarters in Kadoma, Osaka, Japan. Photo by Pokarin and licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

The sole different new knowledge position we’ve is from the Techno System Study advertising record for 2020 (as reported by Fuji Rumors), which confirms worldwide camera deliveries at 8.9 million devices with the following industry share: Cannon (47.9%), Sony (22.1%), Nikon (13.7%), Fuji (5.6%), and Panasonic (4.4%).

This combines mirrorless, DSLR, and incorporated cameras; the record then centers around the mirrorless phase, with industry shares adjusting to Sony (35.7%), Cannon (32.6%), Fuji (11.8%), Nikon (8.0%), Olympus (6.4%), and Panasonic (5.5%). With worldwide shipping knowledge from CIPA, Panasonic’s share equates to about 157,000 devices, only hair’s thickness straight back from Olympus and Nikon.

Wherever Has Panasonic Come From?

Panasonic’s camera company is primarily predicated on electronic innovation, though, much like Sony, it was producing movie cameras back in the 1980s and knew contact design. The dust-covered record of movie cameras could even make some versions, though they were base corner, point-and-click, affairs like the C-225EF.

Since the 1990s evolved, it steadily introduced more superior technology such as autofocus and super-zooms. At once, it was also developing early compact electronic versions like the PV-DC1000 and NV-DCF1 (both in 1997). Nevertheless, the pivot to electronic found a step-change in its production, essentially created upon the corporate relationships it forged—two stick out which have stood the check of time: Leica and Olympus.

Panasonic was presumably the maker of the 1995 Leica Minilux before the building blocks of the Lumix group of compact cameras in 2001, for which Leica allowed the usage of their contact constructions but left the style and production (subject to approval) to Panasonic. In Inturn, Panasonic focused upon camera electronics. This is similar to Leica’s relationship with Minolta in the 1970s, but this time around, it wanted to reforge itself because the electronic time dawned.

The LC5 and F7 were the very first fruits of the labor and noted a step up from Panasonic’s last promotions; it was the best relationship, at the best time, in the same way, digital camera revenue exploded.


Panasonic was still not positioned because it attempted to reach out distinctively from Nikon, Canon, and Sony (which had only bought the well-established Minolta). Olympus offered an alternate way through their Four Thirds System relationship with Kodak. Olympus had singularly failed to pivot to a digital SLR from their successful line of OM movie cameras. The Four-Thirds was an additional mouthful at the apple, except this time around performing something purposely different to different suppliers that were not APS-C or w

The Panasonic L1 DSLR. Photo by Rama and licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0 FR.

hole frame.


The E-1 was Olympus’s first providing that introduced a brand new alarm measurement and contact install, starting a new process from scratch. Kodak was now in the sunset of the electronic time and would soon diminish to obscurity. However, it equipped the first receptors before Panasonic stuffed the production space in later Olympus models. Ultimately, only Panasonic (and, as a result, Leica) and Olympus built camera figures for the Four-Thirds ecosystem.

The E-1 was a revolutionary fail; the 2x plant factor of the Four Thirds specification offered cameras achieve and, with small files, potentially speed. Additionally, it designed they could be equally smaller and lighter. Olympus produced the E-1 for media and activities photographers, but fundamentally it was not very priced and had somewhat gradual firing speeds and AF compared to Canon and Nikon.

The Panasonic G1 was the first Micro Four Thirds system camera body.

Panasonic, however, had joined the party and produced their first-ever DSLR in the shape of the L1 in 2006. The L1 and their successor, the L10, were Panasonic’s only Four-Thirds cameras because the brand pushed forward with developing the Micro Four Thirds (MFT) system. Who knows who created the idea, but perhaps Panasonic’s movie qualifications were the driver behind removing the mirror box; this offered more video-like efficiency and saved space and weight. However, the disadvantage was that it now counted on contrast focusing, a strategy in their infancy.

Panasonic was the first to ever the production punch with the release of the G1 in 2008, followed — in time — by the Olympus Pen E-P1. While it would get Olympus till 2012 with the freedom of the OM-D E5 to innovate, Panasonic had nailed their motives to the mast from time one. The video was master, and there are a robust industry of amateur (and not amateur) videographers wanting the product.


The Panasonic LC5 (left) and F7 (right) digital cameras.

Panasonic had healthy revenue from time one and had the central spot in BCN mirrorless at 38.7% in 2011 when the group first appeared (probably from 2008). It was not before the release of the OM-D E-M5 in 2012 that Olympus eventually overtook it. Possibly Panasonic found the writing on the wall at this point, whether it was necessary to promote equally small and large receptors or that Olympus was entirely devoted to MFT. However, it decided to produce full-frame versions in the shape of the S1 and S1R in 2019. This demonstrably came from their relationship with Leica; the L-mount first appeared on Leica’s 2014 Leica T and is an entirely contemporary mirrorless install created for full-frame.

The Olympus E-1 was the first Four Thirds camera.

Was this part of Panasonic’s strategy, did Leica need Panasonic to generate a full-frame design as part of their formal alliance, or was it the opportunity that showed itself? Regardless of the reason, Panasonic now sees itself with an enviable range of MFT cameras that can be compact and exceptionally proficient at the video. They’re with a high-performance full-frame camera that shares a heritage with Leica and has an increasing range of native lenses.

There’s now equal width and degree to their offerings

Does Panasonic Have an Intelligent Long-Term Strategy?

The bigger question is this: does Panasonic — from bottom-of-the-bin movie cameras to high-performance full-frame cameras — have a clever long-term strategy? Or are cameras simply a corporate plaything reinforced and cross-subsidized by the more prominent company?

Firstly, Panasonic does not have a long camera heritage like Canon or Nikon; there is apparent pleasure in their services and products. However, it is not the ethnic cornerstone of the business.

The Panasonic S1R (left) and S1 (right) full-frame mirrorless cameras.

Secondly, it’s been constant in their quest for accomplishment and industry share from their early alliance with Leica.

Additionally, it hasn’t been scared to innovate within the restrictions of its former partners. Cannon, Nikon, and Sony have all been singularly focused on their methods and, in their very own ways, traditional (although perhaps less so with Sony).

Have developments in Four Thirds, MFT, and full-frame only been an incident of being in the best at the best time, or has Panasonic been gradually building width and degree as capacity and capacity have improved? It was recently devoted to continuous the width of their MFT offerings.


Turning this line of thinking on their head, was full-frame a “done deal” right from the start? Was there always a schedule to generate a large alarm design with Leica as equal organizations created in conjunction? Are we viewing the fruits of the strategy even as we enter the 2020s?

Is Panasonic going to boost their industry presence, building out their full-frame selection as part of the L-Mount Alliance with Leica and Sigma? Or is all we are viewing a haphazard method of their product range development? If the L-Mount is not successful, can it pull the product selection to keep its focus on Micro Four Thirds?

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Apple Plans To Double Its Digital Advertising Business Workforce.



The move raises industry concerns following the launch of privacy guidelines which make it impossible to create ads that are tailored to iPhone users

Apple plans to more than double its workforce within its rapidly growing digital advertising business in less than 18 months after it enacted radical privacy rules that crippled its larger competitors in the lucrative business.

The iPhone maker has about 250 employees per LinkedIn advertising platforms team. On the Apple careers website, it’s looking to fill additional 216 positions, which is quadruple the 56 positions that it had hired in the latter half of 2020. Apple denied the claims. However, it declined to provide any further details.

The digital advertising industry has been apprehensive over Apple’s plans for advertising since the company introduced privacy regulations this year, which have shaken up the market for digital ads worth $400 billion and made it more challenging to customize ads for Apple’s one billion+ iusers Phone .


Since the new policy was implemented, Facebook parent Meta, Snap and Twitter have lost billions of dollars in revenue and a significant amount in market valuations, even though other contributory factors exist.

“It was almost like a global panic,” Jade Arenstein, global service director at Incubate, a South African-based marketing performance firm, was quoted as saying about the impact of Apple’s recent changes.

The once-flourishing advertising business is “incredibly fast-growing”, according to an ad for jobs. The business has grown from a mere few hundred million dollars in revenue in the last quarter of 2010 to an estimated $5bn in the current year, according to research firm Evercore ISI, which expects Apple to be able to grow its $30 billion advertising revenue within four years.

Compared with Google and Facebook and their 2021 revenue from advertising was $115bn and $209bn. For instance, Apple’s business in advertising is small. The digital advertising industry is worried that it will increase due to establishing rules that critics and rivals believe provide it with an advantage.

“Building new ad systems to effectively compete with incumbents with tens of thousands of employees and 10 to 20 years of maturity would normally be an impossible task,” said Alex Austin, chief executive of the ad tech group Branch. “Unless,” he added, “you were somehow able to disadvantage those competitors on your platform.”


Apple has been for a long time the most prominent Big Tech outlier for not taking part in “surveillance capitalism” — the practice of offering customers free services but making money on their data through targeting ads on them.

“We could make a tonne of money if we monetized our customers — if our customers were our product,” chief executive Tim Cook said in 2018. “We’ve elected not to do that.”

However, with Apple having twice the number of developers who can purchase ads on the App Store over the last two years and preparing plans to expand, the critics are seeing Cook taking a significant turn.

David Steinberg, chief executive of Zeta Global, a marketing technology firm, said Apple had been “Machiavellian” and “brilliant” in implementing privacy regulations that required rivals to revamp their advertising infrastructure while creating an opening to fill the gap.

“They could build out (their advertising business) dramatically (and) the ‘air cover’ is they are protecting the consumer’s privacy,” said the researcher. Added.


Apple did not comment on its long-term plans. The job advertisements tell prospective employees that the company’s goals are nothing more than “redefining advertising” for a “privacy-centric” world.

The 216 positions Apple wants to fill are managers and designers of products, in addition to data engineers and sales experts.

An advertisement for an engineer, released on August 24, is a reference to “Apple’s most confidential and strategic plans” and explains how the company plans to “build the most secure technology-driven, technologically sophisticated . . . Supply (Marketplace) Platform and Demand Side Platform”.

These are the core aspects of an ad tech company that allows advertisers to purchase and sell ads across multiple exchanges, possibly advertising in mobile applications downloaded through the App Store. Apple may be able to consider apps for mobile “first-party” data because all activities take place on the iPhone, which is in line with its privacy regulations which ban third-party apps’ contentful monitoring of users.

The positions are predominantly located in the US. However, there are at least 27 roles in Europe and 12 in China and 12 in India and four located in Japan, as well as two positions in Singapore.


“That’s a giant team — that’s bigger than most small companies,” Arenstein said. Arenstein. “Wherever there is smoke, there is fire, and that’s some smoke.”

Apple has never been averse to advertising by itself. Its CEO Steve Jobs even tried to create an in-app advertising business in 2010, so that iPhone apps would remain completely free. Cook is against how personal information is purchased and traded by opaque third parties without iPhone users’ consent.

Yet, Apple set the rules regarding how advertisements should function and later expanding into this very subject is seen by many as unsatisfactory.

At the moment, it’s more secure — in terms of the economy of surveillance using an Apple phone over one that is a Google phone, as Google has designed its products to support surveillance, while Apple isn’t, in its essence, an advertising firm,” said Claire Atkin co-founder at Check My Ads, a surveillance agency. “But if Apple suddenly delves into that realm, they won’t have a that competitive advantage.”

Apple might be putting its image at risk if regulators and consumers oppose its privacy claims which have been a significant part of the recent iPhone campaigns. If the argument prevails, Apple would have an unobstructed runway.


Margo Kahnrose, Chief Marketing Officer at Skai, an omnichannel advertising platform, has said that she believes it “makes absolute logical sense” for Apple to develop its advertising network, following the lead of Google, Facebook and Amazon.

Adtech’s power has, she explained, for a long time been flowing from the decentralized “open web” to “walled gardens” run by one company that can control how ads are purchased and served, as well as how they are measured and tracked.

“The world has been unnerved by Apple’s ambitions for a long time,” she said. “There are a few companies that have vast quantities of power, and Apple is the one that is sleeping.

Continue Reading


Six Ways To Maintain A Growth Mindset While Running A Business.



To be successful as an entrepreneur, starting your business with the appropriate mentality is essential. A growth-oriented mindset implies always striving to improve the product or service you offer or the ability to communicate with people in your industry. Many companies start as small, but they expand in time to become massive businesses that impact people’s lives in the millions. However, this kind of growth isn’t a quick process – it requires a lot of time and effort, and it’s all with constant improvement.

Six Ways to Maintain a Growth Mindset While Running a Business.

1.) Change your outlook

If you’re in the business of managing, it’s easy to become caught up in the day-to-day and forget about the bigger perspective. However, if you’d like your business to flourish, keeping an attitude of growth is essential. Being able to open your mind to be fully engaged in the things you believe are the best for you is crucial.

2) Are you in your comfort zone?

One of the difficulties of managing a business is it’s easy to get into a routine. Once you’ve discovered a method that works, it might be tempting to stick to it. However, staying with the same formula with different outcomes isn’t intelligent. If you’re looking for your business to expand, make sure you alter things with slight adjustments to ensure that your business feels fresh and exciting.

3.) Be prepared to take the risk

Nobody said creating and running a company was easy, regardless of whether you’re putting together an exercise calendar or an entirely new line of clothing. It’s one of the most challenging tasks you’ll ever have to do. If you want to succeed, you must have a mindset of improvement. Create a staff around you. Find people who can assist your company in its growth. It’s not necessary to shoulder all the responsibility for your company. After all. Make sure you take sensible risks. There is undoubtedly a danger involved in taking risks, but when you take calculated risks, you reap a calculated reward. The most successful entrepreneurs realize that sometimes it takes a long time to bring an idea to fruition. Therefore, they remain in the game and push forward.


4.) Connect with others who are adamant about your abilities

One of the most effective methods to keep a positive mental attitude is to surround yourself with people who are confident in your abilities. If you’re always around optimistic people who believe in your ambitions, It’s easier to stay inspired and push ahead.

5) Discuss your concerns

If you’re in charge of an enterprise, it’s simple to become distracted by the day-to-day and forget about the bigger overall picture. It’s possible to worry about how to make ends meet and meet deadlines or having to deal with demanding customers. Discussing these concerns with the rest of your entrepreneurial friends and colleagues is essential to ensure that things stay on the right track.

6) Be focused on progress, not perfect

When you’re an entrepreneur is effortless to be caught in the pursuit of perfection. You’d like your service or product to look flawless before launching it, but the reality is that it’s impossible to be perfect. It is essential to keep in mind that the pace of progress will always be better than perfect. Start by taking it one day at a. The advantage of keeping a single day in mind at a time is that even should things not go as scheduled. It doesn’t matter since tomorrow is another day to start from scratch. Create workable goals. After creating some feasible goals, please keep track of them and assess how they performed based on outcomes rather than the amount of time and effort poured into them.

Continue Reading


What Is Good Debt and Bad Debt for a Small Business?



There are two kinds of loans for small companies. Find out which one is best and which one is not.

For many people, the term “debt” has negative connotations. However, when setting up a small-sized company, it is not necessary to stay clear of debt completely. There’s “good debt” that is essential for growth when you start an enterprise, but there’s “bad” debt that could cause long-term harm to your financial situation.

The difference between good and bad debt and how to manage your company’s finances to keep them in check.

Good debt in contrast to. Credit card debt What’s the distinction?

Lyle Solomon, principal attorney for Oak View Law Group, states, “good debt returns money to your pocket, but bad debt takes money from your pocket.”


“Debt that increases your future net worth is considered good debt, and debt that reduces your future net value is referred to as bad debt,” Solomon added.

Good debt

Kenneth Hearn, fund manager and director of research for Swiss One Capital AG, describes good small-sized business loans as the money borrowed to finance things that contribute to the development and growth of their company.

“This could be for anything from paying for improvements to meet new safety regulations or expanding your human resources team,” the man explained. “A general rule of ‘good debt’ is debt that is low-interest, or will increase the overall net worth of your business.”

Paying off your debts shows you have a good payment history, which your credit rating can show. The more debt types you can manage responsibly and pay off, the more favourable. This means that more lenders will permit you to get in the future.

Bad debt

When a lender takes out money to purchase an item that doesn’t increase in value or produce revenue, it is often regarded as bad credit. Any loan or borrowed funds that could lower the value of your company’s net future must be avoided. The signs of bad debt are the high-interest cost, fees, and strict loan repayment conditions.


Examples of lousy credit include cash advances and payday loans, usually called “predatory loans.”

“These loans . Target people with bad credit or low income with few options to consider,” Solomon added. Solomon. “[They often] come with exorbitant interest rates and unethical terms.”

Things to think about when making a “good debt an investment

If you are considering getting a loan, entrepreneurs in small businesses should consider the type of debt they’ll be taking on. If the lender takes out a loan for an asset that isn’t going to depreciate, for example, real estate, education, or their own company, on favourable terms, it’s considered to be a good debt.

“Healthy debt entails borrowing money for investing in items that do not depreciate over time,” Solomon explained. Solomon. “Keep the above in mind when you borrow money to run your business. Use the funds to minimize the chance of a catastrophe or loss.”

One approach small business owners may employ when borrowing money is to commit to the lowest rate of interest possible.


“Your interest payments are tax-deductible,” Hearn said. Hearn. “These tax deductions could help you get over the red line and into the realm of profitability. If you manage your cards correctly, interest rates can benefit you rather than against you.”

Strategies to get out of credit

If a small-sized business owner is trying to escape the burden of bad debt, There are options to overcome the situation. First, examine the company’s budget and financial statements.

“Financial management software has come a long way over the past couple of decades, and having proper procedures for data entry and its use from the start of your business is crucial to managing good or bad debt,” Hearn said. Hearn.

For business owners who are in “bad debt,” Solomon advised consolidating debts to one loan.

“Debt consolidation is an intelligent debt management approach to ensure you’re paying the lowest rates and on the most optimal or flexible terms available,” said the expert to CO–. “Such a move would benefit your business, as you can avoid worries regarding payments.”


Companies must ensure they have the funds to repay this consolidating loan, or it could negatively affect their business credit and financial situation. However, if used properly in the right way, consolidating or restructuring multiple debts is an innovative method of managing the finances of small businesses.

Continue Reading