Connect with us


The Curse Of The Black Serpent.



Two stories from The Unexplained Plus. A collection of first-hand accounts.

This story was sent to me by mail. Although it isn’t first-hand, and I don’t know the author, I found it fascinating enough to include.

My grandmother was the daughter of a wealthy businessman who owned large houses in Pieta. People used to marry much earlier than today, at 15 years old or 16; my grandmother was not fair-skinned, but she was still her father’s “blue-eyed baby.”

Her mother tried to minimize the loss of her only child but encouraged (not to mention forced) her to live in one of their large homes, some of them vacant.


The young couple chose a large house that had a yard, even if it was not the biggest, and they were married in no time. The couple lived happily in the house for 12 to 15 months before their first child was born.

He was a happy, healthy boy with fair hair and blue eyes. Grandma was very particular about the “baby with blue eyes” when she spoke to anyone she met.

Two other young mothers had experienced the same thing in that house.

Even the elderly milkman heard the daily bulletin about the baby, along with his 20-goat herd, as early as 6.30 am.

Grandma was frightened by a giant, black snake that crawled into her yard. She was terrified and didn’t know what to do. Grandpa had just walked to Grand Harbour to get to work. In those days, there were no cars or buses. The first person to call was the milkman. The daily greeting was quite different from the usual. She told the milkman, excitedly and in her highest voice, what she had just seen.

The milkman replied in a low tone: “Madam. Yesterday you said that your healthy boy was about three months old.” He quietly walked off, not knowing what would happen in the three days following the snake’s appearance …”.


Three days later, the healthy young boy’s baby was dead. Unbelievable.

Grandma was insistent on attending the funeral, and that was the last time she ever walked down the large doors of her house.

She discovered that two other young mothers had experienced the same thing in the house years before. It is unknown if the black snake ever returned.

This incident took place in 1870. My grandma told me about it before her death in 1932.

Ghostly parade of souls

Gina was a Roman Catholic devout. Before she fell asleep, Gina prayed a litany of prayers every night. It had been a busy day, and her eyes were heavier than usual. She gave up on her prayers for the dead and began to feel tired.

Her room was brightly lit after she had been awake for a while. She checked her watch, but it was midnight.


Then she heard it. It was the sound of people praying.

The prayer would begin with a man’s voice and be followed by crowd murmurs. It seemed that the sound was getting closer.

She got up from her bed and pulled a scarf around her shoulders. He walked to the window and surveyed the view.

A ghostly procession of spirits, each carrying candles, filled the road. The parade traveled to Addolorata Cemetery and was slowly moving down her street.

She was terrified by the chanting spirits and ran back to her bed, pulling the covers over her head. She pleaded with her breathless, “Give them eternal rest!”

It was suddenly dark and quiet again.


They had received another night of peace.

These stories are the 47th and 48th of a series of short stories. The Sunday Times of Malta runs every Sunday. This is an excerpt from The Unexplained Plus (Allied Publications) by Vanessa Macdonald. The original edition was published in 2001. It has been reprinted twice. The Unexplained Plus was issued a second time. Ta’ Barra Minn Hawn, the Maltese version (Klabb Kotba Maltin), is the Maltese edition of this book.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Synchron secures $40M from Series B, led by Khosla Ventures to Launch U.S. Clinical Trials of Minimally Invasive Brain Computer Interface.



New YORK–(BUSINESS NEWS)-The company Synchron, a brain-computer interface platform business, has today announced that it had secured $40 million from a Series B round financing which Silicon Valley venture capital firm Khosla Ventures led. Synchron is the market leader in implantable, minimally invasive brain-computer interface (BCI) technology that uses the jugular vein as a conduit to allow access to the brain. Synchron has begun the first clinical trial in Australia, including four patients who have paralysis and have received implantation. They are being evaluated for their capability to control digital devices with the help of thought to increase their ability to function independently.

“This technology is poised to positively impact the world at a large scale,” said Synchron CEO Thomas Oxley, MD, Ph.D. “The money will take us through clinical trials and opens the way for an initial FDA approval for implantable computers for the brain for the brain: an important step towards realizing the therapeutic benefits of this new technology.”

The funds will be used to start a pivotal clinical trial of the U.S. of Synchron’s StentrodeTM technology that will allow digital devices for those with leg paralysis. The funds can fund an innovation pipeline for stimulation and neurointerventional products to treat multiple neurological disorders.

The other investors included Forepont Capital Partners, ID8 Investments, Shanda Group, General Advance, and Subversive Capital (Michael Auerbach). Mind Capital (Christian Angermayer), Arani Bose (Penumbra), and Thomas Reardon. Existing investors also participated in the round, including NeuroTechnology Investors, METIS Innovations, and the University of Melbourne. This round brings the amount of money raised from the company’s creation to $59 million with support provided by both government officials from the U.S. and Australian governments.


“We believe that Synchron’s minimally-invasive approach that brings the idea of stents commonly used in modern times is going to define the next generation of brain-machine interface,” stated Alex Morgan, MD, Ph.D., an associate at Khosla Ventures. “My uncle had a stroke, and the resultant paralysis forced him to use the wheelchair, which limited his arm movement and legs, which makes Synchron’s future emphasis on paralysis an idea that resonates with me.”

Synchron’s motor-neuroprosthetic platform, which includes the Stentrode, is designed to improve patients’ capability to use their digital devices. The neuroprosthesis is made to transform the thoughts of actions into Bluetooth commands, allowing the communication of their caregivers and family members and increasing their everyday functionality. The device is implanted by a minimally invasive neurointerventional procedure commonly employed to treat stroke.

“By using the blood vessels as the natural highway into the brain, we can access all areas, which traditionally required open surgery and removal of the skull in multiple locations,” added Dr. Oxley, a trained neuro interventionist.

Synchron has more than 60 patents for interventional electrophysiology that span conditions like epilepsy, paralysis, depression, and Parkinson’s disease, as well as pain addiction and other non-medical applications.

“Future generation of the Stentrode could provide completely new possibilities in direct two-way communication with the human brain, as well as the potential to treat a wide variety of neuropsychiatric illnesses and address vast areas of unmet needs,” added Dr. Morgan.


Synchron is a brain interface platform firm that is an innovator in implantable neural interfaces. The company is currently at the stage of clinical development with an implantable neuroprosthesis commercially available to treat paralysis and is now creating the first endovascular implantable neuromodulation therapy. Future applications could include the possibility of diagnosing and treating diseases of the nervous system disorders, such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s depression, hypertension, and other conditions, as well as non-medical options. Based in New York City, Synchron has offices in Silicon Valley, California, and R&D facilities in Melbourne, Australia.

Continue Reading


Dailypay $175 Series m 325 Million Barron Online The Blog of the Guest News.



DailyPay is a company that uses software that allows employees to manage their pay. It boosts $175 million Series A and $325M in debt investment. As of the date when this article was written, the cost of the agency was $1Bplus.

Since the beginning, Jessica Mah, a businesswoman, has enjoyed top-quality results. It has worked with numerous companies, including Walmart, United Parcel Service, and Adecco, a significant personnel company.

DailyPay employs between a hundred to 12000 people and will pay them around $500 million annually. Bartering better pay arrangements with large employers is its primary goal.

Jessica Mah, CEO at DailyPay who spoke about how DailyPay transformed into an innovative technology for professionals and giving them the ability to influence their financial future. We’re connecting between 100,000 employees to their employers and building an online platform that allows employers and employees to make better choices about the way they spend their money.


The agency raised $71 million during its May 2017 investment round. This time, it’s reached the $200M mark. It raised substantial funds in December to finance its rapid growth.

Daily pay 175m Series 325m Barrononline

I recently discovered the Dailypay M Series on the Barrononline site and became enthralled by their claims that they can earn me money by conducting surveys.

But, after conducting some investigation, I found that this site is not more than a fraud. They won’t offer you a reward for taking surveys, and will attempt to sell you other items which you don’t really need.

I would suggest avoiding this website altogether. Numerous other legitimate survey sites will pay you in exchange for time. Do not waste time on the Dailypay M series M Barrononline!

There are some essential things to consider when you try to identify the Ponzi scheme. First, you must determine whether the investment offers the highest returns or guarantees. If the recovery seems like it could be too great to be accurate, they most likely aren’t.


Another warning sign is if the business isn’t registered with SEC. All legitimate investment companies have to be registered with the SEC.

Be wary of businesses that ask investors to put down large amounts of money in advance. Ponzi schemes usually require investors to deposit large sums of money before they begin earning any profits.

If you spot some warning signs, you should stay clear from investing in the company. It’s likely to be a Ponzi scheme.

Strategies to prevent being

There are some things one can take to prevent being fooled. The first is only to do business with reputable companies. If you need more clarification about a particular company, investigate to determine if it’s legitimate.

Then, be wary of any business that asks for your details in advance. Scammers may pretend to be legitimate businesses to obtain your details. Make sure you only disclose your details to companies you can trust.


Thirdly, be aware of any suspicious signs. If it seems too promising to be accurate, it likely is. Be cautious of any business which makes false claims or promises.

If you take these steps, you’ll be able to stay clear of being taken advantage of. But, if you encounter a situation where you believe you are a fraud victim, you should contact for help with the Better Business Bureau or your local consumer protection office to seek assistance.

Continue Reading


Facebook’s Privacy Pivot is Unsatisfactory in a Key Area.



Mark Zuckerberg is laying out an idea for Facebook’s future focused on privacy. What about the business model?

If there’s a single decision Facebook has repeatedly made over the last 15 years, it is that it has emphasized growth more than privacy. The users were always incentivized to make more data public than they felt comfortable with. The settings for making things public were often more user-friendly than the ones that made things private. Information was collected that you had no idea was being collected and distributed in ways you weren’t aware would be used. Sometimes, data was suddenly published in one go. They were the choice of a young man confident in himself and the reputation of Internet users. These were the decisions of someone building an advertising company based on the accumulation of innumerable information.

Today, Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Facebook, has turned 34. He’s a prominent person who is frequently criticized in the media as well as by politicians across the globe. He has two kids and a home that he blocks out of view, and a camera cover for your laptop’s camera. He’s also witnessed his company being criticized for not respecting its users’ privacy concerns. He’s observed how the system he designed to create a world that is more open and connected could also be employed by racists, harassers, and trolls, as well as bullies along with Vladimir Putin. The company’s reputation has deteriorated as the company’s growth on its main website has slowed, and employees’ morale has dipped. It’s an ideal time to make a shift.

So on Wednesday morning, Facebook pressed its emergency brakes, removed the steering wheel, and changed gears. Zuckerberg wrote a 3000-word essay that outlines “a privacy-focused strategy” of his business. “Public social media continue to be significant in people’s lives–for being able to connect with your friends as well as for introducing new people to concepts and information, and also giving individuals a greater voice,” Zuckerberg wrote. “But today, with the numerous ways that people prefer to communicate privately, There’s an opportunity to create a simpler platform that focuses on the privacy of users first.”


In the article, Zuckerberg made many promises regarding enhancing security on Facebook and Instagram and keeping servers away from dictatorial countries whose officials seek to monitor their citizens. He also emphasized the need to reduce the “permanence” of messages or stories. Everyone wants their photos of bongs to be kept from circulated when applying for job openings. Zuckerberg also detailed how Facebook will combine three messaging platforms: Facebook Messenger, Instagram Direct, and WhatsApp. The three platforms, according to Zuckerberg, are interoperable, but they will not be merged. “With the ability to send messages across our platforms,” he wrote, “you’d be capable of sending encrypted messages to a number on WhatsApp via Messenger.” That’s the same way encryption from end to end will be available across three platforms, even though privacy advocates have raised the potential pitfalls of this plan.

Zuckerberg stated six privacy rules. However, there was a significant omission: He said very little about how Facebook will take a different approach to data sharing and targeting in the future that is focused on privacy. The open flow of data among Facebook and third-party developers was, at the very least, the issue that prompted the jaws of the nation’s media to latch onto the company’s thigh. One year ago, in March, it was reported that a person named Aleksandr Kogan had misappropriated the data of tens and millions of Facebook users and had given it to a shadowy political consultancy firm called Cambridge Analytica. It was soon evident that Cambridge Analytica was not alone and that Facebook allowed hundreds of programmers to access information for many years.

The loose policies of the company regarding data collection throughout the years have helped it build one of the biggest and most profitable advertising firms in history. The data that Facebook gathers allows advertisers to determine who they should target and how to do it. The constant pursuit of that information has led to Facebook becoming accused of making unsuitable deals to sell data to manufacturers of devices and software partners. This is a story that Zuckerberg is aware of and acknowledged in his blog post. “I recognize that a lot of people aren’t convinced that Facebook could or will like to create this type of privacy-focused platform because it’s true that we don’t have a reputation for creating privacy-protective products,” he wrote.

These changes Zuckerberg announced Wednesday would increase security for Facebook’s 2.3 billion daily users. End-to-end encryption could be crucial to the safety of physical objects, as Zuckerberg states. It’s not recommended to establish servers in Venezuela and Syria. Facebook should only be allowed to keep the user’s data for a short time. People who advocate for privacy have been calling for changes, and Zuckerberg’s merits are that he’s stated that he will address these issues. Also, to his credit, he’s hired experts who are knowledgeable about these issues.

This should also be a welcome development for the regulators who have been hovering around Facebook as lions do around gazelles. In January 2020, an expansive privacy law in California was scheduled to take direction. While this is happening, Congress has been holding hearings and is working on federal privacy legislation that will, shortly, give consumers more control over their personal information and limit the ability of businesses to use and collect this information. It is believed that the European Union has already implemented the changes in the General Data Protection Regulation. As one ex-Facebook employee claimed to WIRED, Zuckerberg was trying to get ahead of the police. One former Facebook employee has pointed out via Twitter that this could limit the company’s potential expansion into China.


However, the issue is what Facebook’s priorities currently are. Privacy isn’t for free. If you put it on the top of your list in your life, you’re usually obliged to make other things more important. Zuckerberg admits to this in his post, noting that it is more challenging to regulate systems that are secure from end to end. The trend of directing people to be private and ephemeral messages could create new problems for media organizations seeking to expand their reach through the platform and make news consumption more difficult on Facebook.

In the end, Zuckerberg needs to address the most significant dilemma: Are these changes compatible with Facebook’s business model based on a constant data supply from users? If these changes are implemented, they will have significant business costs to pay. If he answers his questions, Zuckerberg’s privacy vision will remain fulfilling.

Continue Reading